Category Archives: Republicans/Neo-Cons

May 22, 2013

Despite Rubio’s wooing, radio hosts protest immigration reform bill

Ingraham blasted her disenchantment with Rubio on her show last week, when she said Republicans had “put all our hopes in a person, instead of in principles,” when they trusted Rubio to negotiate on their behalf for immigration reform.


U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., with other senators in the gang of eight.

Conservative radio talk show hosts have signed a letter opposing the sweeping immigration reform bill in the Senate, bucking tea party favorite Sen. Marco Rubio’s attempts to win their support for the bill, which would combine enhanced border security with a legalization program for the nation’s unauthorized immigrants. Rubio, a member of the “gang of eight” senators who drafted the bill, has become the most prominent conservative spokesman for its passage.

Conservative talk show host Laura Ingraham, who had Rubio on her show twice in the past few months to let him make his pitch for the bill, signed onto the open letter that says the “unsalvageable” measure “would do more harm than good.” The statement, signed by more than 100 conservative groups and leaders, argues that the bill is laden with earmarks and “rewards” lawbreakers by allowing most of the country’s 11 million undocumented immigrants to legalize if they pass a background check and pay fines.

Some influential conservatives have argued that the party needs to embrace reform in order to combat its declining support among Hispanic voters and to fix a broken system, even though the bill is also high on President Barack Obama’s agenda.

[...]

Complete text linked here.


May 21, 2013

Squelching the Tea Party Gave Obama the Election

Remember all the headlines during the election, wondering what happened to the Tea Party, the liberal crowing that it had gone silent?

NPR, February 2012: “Strong in 2010, Where Is the Tea Party Now?” – “what’s most striking about the movement this election has been its notable absence.” Mother Jones, “The Tea Party is Dead.” .” ABC: “What Happened to the Tea Party?” New York Times, June 2012: “The Movement Has Fizzled Out.”

Remember how odd it was hear conservative pundits saying, ‘our voters would crawl over broken glass to vote against Obama’, while pollsters correctly predicted that Republican turnout would be nowhere near what it was in 2010? Remember 2010, when the Tea Party grassroots roared? Remember 2012, when the Tea Party was missing?

Obama lost Democrat votes in the 2012 election. He won because Republicans stayed home. Democrats got their vote out, we didn’t. The contrast between Republican turnout in 2010 and 2012 can be summed up in two words: Tea Party.

[...]

Complete text linked here.


May 17, 2013

Poll: Conservative Support for Marco Rubio Plummets

The latest Public Policy Polling data bears sobering news for Senator Marco Rubio, showing his support among conservatives has substantially decreased since last month.

When asked for their preferred GOP candidate, only 17% of “very conservative” respondents favored Rubio, while only 18% of “somewhat conservative” respondents favored Rubio.

This is a steep decline from the same poll’s findings in April, when Rubio’s support was 26% among the“very conservative” and 22% among the “somewhat conservative.”

The survey was conducted between May 6–9th. The survey released in April was conducted between March 27–30th. The “Gang of 8″ bill, spearheaded by Senator Rubio, was released April 17th.

[...]

Complete text linked here.


May 10, 2013

Requiem for a Grand Old Party by Pat Buchanan

Obama won only 39 percent of White America, lowest ever of any victorious presidential candidate. But he did not need any more white votes, when he was carrying people of color 4 to 1.

Has the bell begun to toll for the GOP?

The question arises while reading an analysis of Census Bureau statistics on the 2012 election by Dan Balz and Ted Mellnik.

One sentence in their Washington Post story fairly leaps out:

“The total number of white voters actually decreased between 2008 and 2012, the first such drop by any group within the population since the bureau started to issue such statistics.”

America’s white majority, which accounts for nine in 10 of all Republican votes in presidential elections, is not only shrinking as a share of the electorate, but it is declining in numbers, as well.

The Balz-Mellnik piece was primarily about the black vote.

Sixty-six percent of the black electorate turned out, to 64 percent of the white electorate. Black turnout in 2012 was higher by 1.7 million than in 2008. Hispanic turnout rose by 1.4 million votes.

But from 2008 to 2012, the white vote fell by 2 million.

This is the crisis of the Grand Old Party:

Minorities, peoples of color – Hispanic, black, Asian – gave 80 percent of their votes to Obama. And while the minorities’ share of the electorate was 26 percent in 2012, minorities constitute 36.3 percent of the population. And their share of both the electorate and the population is inexorably rising.

[...]

Complete text linked here.


May 3, 2013

Rubio faces St. Lucie Co. Protest by Tea Partiers over immigration reform

Is the “Tea Party darling” a darling no more?

Marco Rubio: Tea Party darling. Or is he?

Wednesday night at the St. Lucie County Lincoln Day Dinner – an annual fundraising event for the Republican Party – Rubio faced the fury of some in the Tea Party, as they ripped him for helping to spearhead immigration reform.

Without them Rubio might not be here: a US senator at the front of the national immigration reform debate.

But as he spoke inside – to St. Lucie County Republicans – around two dozen protesters outside spoke too.

“He was the Tea Party darling. Until he went to DC and played us,” said Christine Timmon, a Tea Party supporter.

“We put him into office and this is not what he promised us,” said another.

The bill that Rubio helped write calls for a pathway to citizenship for law-abiding and taxpaying illegals.

It also increases border security and gives permanent residency to children of illegal aliens.

“What about the twenty, to twenty-two million American workers who can’t find a full-time job?” said David Caulkett of Floridians for Immigration Enforcement.

But Rubio says that leaving things the way they are is defacto amnesty anyway, and argues that not shoring up borders will lead to twice as big a problem in ten years.

[...]

Complete text linked here.


May 1, 2013

Their War, Not Ours By Patrick J. Buchanan

Congressional war hawks, led by Sens. John McCain and Lindsey Graham, are cawing for air strikes and no-fly zones, which would mean dead and captured Americans and many more dead Syrians.

“The worst mistake of my presidency,” said Ronald Reagan of his decision to put Marines into the middle of Lebanon’s civil war, where 241 died in a suicide bombing of their barracks.

And if Barack Obama plunges into Syria’s civil war, it could consume his presidency, even as Iraq consumed the presidency of George W. Bush.

Why would Obama even consider this?

Because he blundered badly. Foolishly, he put his credibility on the line by warning that any Syrian use of chemical weapons would cross a “red line” and be a “game changer” with “enormous consequences.”

Not only was this ultimatum unwise, Obama had no authority to issue it. If Syria does not threaten or attack us, Obama would need congressional authorization before he could constitutionally engage in acts of war against Syria. When did he ever receive such authorization?

Moreover, there is no proof Syrian President Bashar Assad ever ordered the use of chemical weapons.

U.S. intelligence agencies maintain that small amounts of the deadly toxin sarin gas were likely used. But if it did happen, we do not know who ordered it.

Syrians officials deny that they ever used chemicals. And before we dismiss Damascus’ denials, recall that an innocent man in Tupelo, Miss., was lately charged with mailing deadly ricin to Sen. Roger Wicker and President Obama. This weekend, we learned he may have been framed.

[...]

Complete text linked here.


April 28, 2013

Immigration reform: The GOP gangs up on blue-collar workers

Bush didn’t get his wish, but the Gangsters are still pushing for it, none more than Lindsey Graham. The South Carolina Republican has cited “labor shortages” (see video below) in his state as a reason for passing the bill despite the fact that 340,000 South Carolinians are unemployed.


Lindsey Graham

One consequence of the Boston Marathon bombings could be the demise of that immigration bill now before the U.S. Senate.

If so, that would be a good thing. We will get a welcome respite from hearing Republicans mouth the mantra: “First, we have to secure the border.”

That may sound like tough talk. But translated from political-speak, here’s what it really means: “A lot of my backers in business and agriculture want cheap labor. And I intend to deliver it.”

That’s the real message coming from the Republican members of the so-called “Gang of Eight” who are pushing that bill. If you doubt that, consider the example of the Sept. 11 hijackers. They didn’t come over the border. They entered legally with visas. Four of them overstayed those visas, but the federal government had no system for detecting that. The United States is one of the few countries on the planet that checks passports coming in but not going out. About 5 million of the approximately 11 million people in the country illegally are visa overstayers.

Don’t worry, say the Gangsters. The bill contains provisions for exit checks. That may sound good — until you consider that such a law has been on the books since 1996 but it’s never been enforced.

[...]

Complete text linked here.


April 26, 2013

California Congressman Who Loves Cop Killers Calls American Patriots Extremists

“With this gathering of extremist Tea Party patrons right in our own backyard, we need to show the Kochs they can’t just buy elections,” Ruiz said in the fundraising pitch.

Rep. Raul Ruiz is hoping this weekend’s Koch conference will spark a wave of donations to his own re-election campaign.

Ruiz, a Palm Desert Democrat, sent an email to supporters this morning saying the only way to “stand a chance against the Kochs and their billions” is to raise money themselves.

“With this gathering of extremist Tea Party patrons right in our own backyard, we need to show the Kochs they can’t just buy elections,” Ruiz said in the fundraising pitch.

This weekend marks the 10th time that billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch have brought conservative candidates and deep-pocketed Republican donors to the desert.

Details of the two-day gathering – including the local hotel they have reserved– are a closely guarded secret. But speakers are expected to discuss how to diversify the GOP’s voter base.

Officials from the Wichita, Kansas-based Koch Industries have not returned Desert Sun requests for comment.

“We hope they spend thousands of dollars on fancy meals, spa treatments, and souvenirs in our local hotels, restaurants and stores. But unfortunately, it won’t make up for the damage their economic policies have done, in the form of jobs shipped overseas and homes foreclosed,” Ruiz wrote in the email to supporters.

“But they’re not coming to Palm Springs for a relaxing getaway. They’re here to plan how they’re going to spend tens of millions of dollars trying to buy the 2014 elections, just like they did in 2012. A lot of that money will be spent trying to defeat me.”

[...]

Complete text linked here.


April 24, 2013

Pat Buchanan: Will the GOP embrace amnesty?

A year ago, the GOP platform declared, “We oppose amnesty because it would have the effect of encouraging illegal immigration and would give an unfair advantage to those who have broken our laws.” What has changed since then?

During President Dwight Eisenhower’s first term, 60 years ago, the United States faced an invasion across its southern border.

Illegal aliens had been coming since World War II. But, suddenly, the number was over 1 million. Crime was rising in Texas. The illegals were taking the jobs of U.S. farm workers.

Under Gen. Joseph May Swing, the Immigration and Naturalization Service launched “Operation Wetback” and began rounding up and deporting Mexican border-crossers by ship and bus. By the end of Ike’s second term, illegal entries had fallen by 90 percent.

Eisenhower, who had tapped his nuclear hole card twice — first, to force the Chinese to agree to a truce in Korea, then to halt their shelling of the offshore islands in 1958 — was a no-nonsense President.

Measured by population and gross national product, Eisenhower’s America was but half the size of today’s America. Yet, in the 1950s, we were in many ways a stronger and more self-confident country.

We had universal military service, and few complained. As for the deportation of the Mexicans, they had broken in, they did not belong here, and they were going back. End of discussion.

Contrast the rigorous response of Ike’s America to an invasion across our southern border to the hand-wringing moral paralysis of our political elite in dealing with 11-12 million illegal aliens in our midst.

[...]

Complete text linked here.


Pat Buchanan calls ‘Gang of 8? proposal acts of ‘madness,’ ‘suicidal folly’ for GOP

Buchanan later warned this so-called blanket amnesty would have political consequences, and said its passage would herald “the end of the Republican Party as a presidential party” as once-reliable Republican states turn deep blue.

Conservative columnist Pat Buchanan says the “Gang of Eight” immigration reform bill will, if passed, threaten national security and destroy the Republican Party’s ability to compete on a national level.

Buchanan, author of “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?” told radio host Laura Ingraham on Monday that passing a “blanket pardon” of illegal immigrants would be “an act of madness,” particularly in the wake of last week’s terrorist attacks in Boston.

“It’s been one week since something like 178 to 180 Americans — three of them murdered — but 178 injured, maimed and wounded by two individuals who were immigrants to this country who were asylum seekers and granted asylum and given benefits,” Buchanan said. “They were newcomers to America, and the idea that we would be considering amnesty — a blanket pardon for all 11 or 12 or 20 million, or however many millions of illegal immigrants are in the country — [that] we would be considering a blanket pardon is an act of madness.”

“I mean what the United States ought to do and what Marco Rubio and the others ought to do is say what we need to get into law is these enforcement mechanisms we’re working on at the border,” he continued. “Get all the enforcement mechanisms and drop the amnesty until we find out who these folks are and who is in this country. This is ridiculous, absurd that the United States should be thinking about amnesty for 11 or 12 million people right now.”

[...]

Complete text linked here.